Student's Cold War shooting game angers Germans


While Electronic Arts recently discovered just how sensitive the public can be when it comes to video games that depict modern warfare, a student game developer in Germany has just discovered that even games set during the Cold War can stir up enormous controversy in his country.

Jens Stober, a 23-year-old student at the University of Design, Media and Arts in Karlsruhe, Germany, has created a game called "1378 (km)." The game's numeric title refers to the length of the border that once divided East Germany from West Germany during the Cold War years.

The game asks players to play either as an East German trying to escape the country by crossing the area known as the "death strip" or play as a guard tasked with gunning down all would-be escapees.


Stober says that he created the computer game to teach young, tech-savvy Germans about their country's past.

"Becoming an East German escapee or border guard enables players to identify with these figures," he told Reuters. "It's a novel way of encouraging young people to take an interest in coming to terms with recent German history."

But when Stober unveiled "1378 (km)" last week, the game caused a massive public uproar.

Rainer Wagner, who tried to escape from East Germany as a teenager, told Spiegel Online that it was like a "punch in the face." "It feels like I'm being shot at again, emotionally," said Wagner, who was arrested by border guards during his escape attempt.

Meanwhile, various politicians called the game "macabre and scandalous," as well as "tasteless and stupid."

According to various estimates, some 1,000 people were killed trying to escape East Germany by crossing the "death strip." Stober had planned to release the game last Sunday on the anniversary of German reunification. But officials with Stober's university said the game will now be released in December as a free download.

Despite the controversy and launch date change, university officials have stood behind Stober's game and its ability to work as a teaching tool.

Michael Bielicky, a professor who supervised Stober on the project, told Spiegel Online, "Computer games are the ideal medium to reach the younger generation."

The game lets up to 16 players take on the roles of East Germans trying to escape into West Germany or play as the guards that were ordered to shoot anyone that tried to escape. Those who play guards do not have to shoot escapees — they can also arrest them or even join them in their flight. And those that do shoot the escapees find themselves transported to the future and to a court trial — which is what happened in reality.

"In the game, you ask yourself: 'What would I do?,'" Stober told the German news agency DPA. "You may come to the conclusion that you would not shoot at your fellow countrymen and women."

This is not the first time Stober has worked on a game meant to teach people about real-world border-crossing situations. He was a lead map designer on "Frontiers," a computer game that lets players see what it's like to be a refugee trying to make it across a variety of European borders.

Winda Benedetti writes the Citizen Gamer column for msnbc.com. You can follow her tweets about games and other things right here on Twitter

Discuss this article

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

just because they think its tasteless and stupid doesn't mean it is, that is just peoples opinions. there are a lot worse games out there, and if this is based on history and not blowing things out of proportion, then there isn't anything wrong with it. after all, there are american civil war games, and desert storm and other combat games, and what about movies? isn't sylvester stalone insulting veterans with rambo? that is all fiction and totally unreal characterizations.

  • 8 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 7:06 PM EDT

fusseltier pretty much nailed it. While I personally think it's a rather alarming game, the second you ban something like this (I know it isn't, just being hypothetical), the crackdown on free speech just deepens further.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:19 PM EDT

I agree. I think that having the game where you can have the choice makes all the difference.

"Those who play guards do not have to shoot escapees — they can also arrest them or even join them in their flight. And those that do shoot the escapees find themselves transported to the future and to a trial — which is what happened in reality."

I'm glad the University stood behind the student; people shouldn't see it as a slap in the face (I can see where it would be offensive at first), because video games DO attract the attention of the younger generations and can help them to have insight on what happened. If the student was blowing it way out of proportion using extremely graphic images such as brains splattering on the screen then yeah...totally different story, but his intentions were good- just a basic" this is what happened" kind of game. Whereas games such as Modern Warfare II ARE that realistic (actually seeing brain matter on dashboards, etc), but for different reasons- entertainment not necessarily education.

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:38 PM EDT

Sounds like a winner. Now maybe one of our talented American coders will recreate 'Wounded Knee.' Learning history this way could have an emotional punch that people will not yawn through, and actually remember. If we could get students to remember this stuff, maybe we wouldn't have to repeat it every 50 years.

  • 7 votes
#1.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 4:44 AM EDT

Cavalier, interesting concept. Wounded Knee 1890 or 1973?

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 8:18 AM EDT

Why not both, Matt? Histories need teachin'!

    #1.5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:04 AM EDT

    This is beyond tasteless. Also a rather poor way to teach young people about the history of their country. I believe most playing this game would lose the horror of those times because it's a game.

      #1.6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:49 AM EDT

      bruce, how about you actually play the game before you judge it solely by the way it is portrayed in the media? Or just continue being a good little lemming and follow the leader off the cliff....

        #1.7 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:04 AM EDT

        I am a Soldier and at one time a civilian we have games out where I am at that are fun we have all of the the COD games and HALO of course but these game are to kill time and honestly help people make the correct disition when in multi player mode as we play a little differant than the game intended us to play we put 2 or 4 gamers in situation and then ask them shoot or don't shoot as an enemy is inside a house. This teaches the soldier something, If I shoot I could hurt innocent people inside that I cannot see.

        Most soldier I work with love history and we are usually talking about history even as we are on patrol as we are walking in the foot steps of Alexander the great and Gangus Kaun. If a game comes out like this one I feel that you have an audience that will get to see how it was in the prior to wall being torn down. they will be able to make judgement calls. Should I shoot? should I join the people escaping? Should I turn my weapon on other soldiers to prevent them from shooting and then see the tribunal that follows. If you don't want to play then don't buy the game. If I don't like what I hear on the radio I tune it out and find something else. Seriously it's not like they are forcing one to play.

        It would be like having game about 9-11 where you are the President and you have the option in the game to do things differant. Like scramble aircraft to the right place and then choose the best option you allowed. Ground all Civillian air traffic, Make ground calls to evacuate a a certain point or have to make a call to shoot down a civilian airliner prior to it striking the WTC. In some cases it would show the American people how tough decisions were made and how fast these actions have to happen. It would give the arm-chair quaterback an idea of what all needed to be done before he goes and runs his mouth on what he thinks he knows and the attiude,'Well if it would have been me I would have done it this way!"

        Same with the new MOH game pulling the name Taliban from the game opposition list and modifying the game. People are way too PC when it comes to things they don't have to buy or even participate in. If you don't like the game as is DON't by it. I have lost several friends to the Muj and Taliban since 2000 so i understand the feeling of both sides. But we are limiting our first admendment when people who typically don't even play games like these and then curbing the production game to their complaints. As some pointed out above Wounded Knee I am also an American Indian and would like to play a game where I could change history. I would like to ID the Japenees fleet prior to their attack and scramble my Aircraft and have my battle ships at the ready as they approached.

        Now the First admendment does'nt apply to the germans but how long until we start seeing issues like this appear in the US? Such as the new MOH game. I understand the Army's stance on it as it can be used as a training tool for terrorist and these game can also dull down a persons since of morality in some case making them numb to the idea of killing. But again People do not have to buy or play these types of games.

        Personaly I think there should be know first person shooter games at all. I have lived in a combat zone for 10 years and remember vividly every time I have ever had to pull the trigger on my rifle. At my house these games are not in our vast collection of games to play. But again this is just me and how I want to raise my children. To take life is the worst thing a person can do and live with and even simulated is not a good idea. I never want any child nor myself to become numb to life and death. even though some of these game have practical applications for training Teams and Squads for urban and CQB operations.

          #1.8 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:44 AM EDT
          Reply

          1st amendment. don't like it, don't buy it.

          • 5 votes
          Reply#2 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:16 PM EDT

          (Um... 1st Amendment? We're talking about Germans... in Germany; I'm pretty sure the US constitution does not apply to this discussion. And it's being released as a free download - nobody will buy it. Did you read the article?)

          I'm sure this is an emotionally-charged deal in Germany and all, but since shooters go to trial it seems like Jens covered all of his bases.

          Then again I guess it would be kind of like allowing a white character in a game here lynch a black character. There would be outrage even if it went to trial and the white guy were convicted in the game.

          • 6 votes
          #2.1 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:26 PM EDT

          They dont have the American amendments in Germany..... :/

          • 3 votes
          #2.2 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:28 PM EDT

          Thank you for pointing out the obvious. It amazes me how people seem to think the entire world runs on the rules of America. Germany does not have a 1st amendment. Germany can put a lid on it if they choose to do so.

          The only problem I have with this is where do we go from here. If people want to protect this game then what is to stop them from making a game about the holocaust. There are certain topics that aren't meant for interactive education. Medal of Honor and Call of Duty have a lot of WWII battles in their older versions. There are a lot of quotes on the screen and newsreel footage of the war but when it comes right down to it, that wasn't the selling point. It is a game and it is sold as a game. At least this one is being released as a free download.

          Just like the Taliban flap in the new Medal of Honor, making changes out of respect of others is not a bad thing. Being upset that EA made the change is a total disrespect for the families of all the soldiers lost during recent wars. They may not play it but if its popularity is anything like previous releases they will see and hear about it.

          I guess that it comes down to this, if you aren't a veteran or a family member of someone lost in these confrontations you really don't have a right to comment, free speech or not. Myself included.

            #2.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 8:43 AM EDT

            Browns Backer - Ok, since I am a veteran I'll go ahead and comment: In no way do I find it offensive that a video game allows people to play as the 'taliban' online. All they did was change the name, the opposite team's characters are still going to look exactly the same. I find it worrisome that people are getting so offended over a simple name. Should we ban Taliban from being printed in the press now? While we're at it, lets just remove all historical references as well, wouldn't want to upset anyone!

              #2.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:10 AM EDT
              Reply

              I don't understand the reason so many people make a fuss about these war games. If it involves fellow country men being shot, the government bans it. It's just a game for crying out loud.

              • 4 votes
              Reply#3 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:19 PM EDT

              These people need to protest the real wars where real people get really killed and maimed.

                #3.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:05 AM EDT
                Reply

                source engine omfg half-life and day of defeat source ftw w0000t!!!

                • 1 vote
                Reply#4 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:22 PM EDT

                I would not purchase it for personal reasons and would attempt to have you design a better alternative. I do think the feelings of others are important, perhaps far more than we ever realize.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#5 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:28 PM EDT

                Kids don't want to sit through snoozefest history classes and read monotonous history books to learn about stuff. More engaging methods like this are necessary. Of course there will be some people who dislike it; there always is.

                • 2 votes
                Reply#6 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:28 PM EDT

                As somebody who plays video games Id like to say please stop this censorship, it is only a game and people dont play them to pretend to be communist or murders, and this one looks stupid anyway. As for other games (Medal of Honer), why cant you play as the "bad guys", somebody has to. The media ended up makeing the Taliban in that game be called opposing force, and it was just in multiplayer you play as them. Im not buying that game now or any that helps support censoring like that. You would think in America people would know better, thank you Fox ruse for distoring those facts now I cant play that game I was looking foward to, out of principal (and CoD7). I cant speak for everyone, but I couldnt care less what side Im on, its the game and haveing fun that counts.

                • 4 votes
                Reply#7 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:31 PM EDT

                That game is pointless, boring, cheap and it has bad graphics so why do they even care? plus is just a game. why dont they make a game where they kill americans, that whay it would be even. lol :)

                  Reply#8 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:37 PM EDT

                  A German Student wrote the program about German Cold War History! Why would Americans need to be involved in any way to make it 'even'?

                  • 4 votes
                  #8.1 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 9:46 PM EDT

                  Jeen's trying to be funny, failing catastrophically, and forgetting that the Grand Theft Auto game series has plenty of opportunities to shoot Americans. Equal rights means that we should all get electronically killed.

                    #8.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:08 AM EDT
                    Reply

                    It's a game and only a game. The problem is we live in a world of complainers.

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#9 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:38 PM EDT

                    Watch what you say, The Pretender and David-0427! How would you feel if they made a game about the World Trade Centers, Columbine, or OKC just to show people our history in America? Understand how the Germans feel about being told this game is a learning tool. What are you learning?

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#10 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:39 PM EDT

                    Don't worry, ConradC, those will probably be the themes in the next generation games, just give it another 10 years or so.

                    • 1 vote
                    #10.1 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:47 PM EDT

                    They've already made games about that. You can download them from some terrosist site.

                      #10.2 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 9:11 PM EDT

                      There already are games about the WTC and Columbine lol

                      • 1 vote
                      #10.3 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 9:25 PM EDT

                      Well pretender them games are shocking but are in no way made from terrorists, if people would actually look into them and see what the games actually are they would realize the benefit they actually have. I don't really know anything about the WTC game so i can't really comment on that one but the columbine game is most definitely not what the media makes it out to be.

                      If anyone in the media (or anyone that comments on it) took the time to actually play these games they would realize that they aren't what they seem to be and just made out of bad taste but to educate people and teach lessons. Like honestly 1378 km is making people go nuts? First of all it is just a game and second it actually gives you a choice in what you want to do so what the hell is all the fuss about if you want to go around killing Germans ok but that is your choice...that is something you the user has made not something the game made you do.

                      My biggest problem is with medal of honor like people have such a big problem simply because you can play as the taliban in multiplayer. I don't think anyone complaining about this has any idea what being the taliban in multiplayer even means. It's not that you play a whole campaign trying to destroy americans but you play on a team that opposes another team in multiplayer that's all it is. Half the people playing the game don't know or care what team they are on just simply that they do their best and defeat the other team. Simply changing the name from taliban to opfor makes everything ok for everyone?

                      People are just too sensitive nowadays and my heart goes out to the families of lost soldiers but this game has no relation to them just a story that is being told...a fictional story that would be perfectly fine if it were made as a movie but since it is a game for whatever reason that makes it wrong. Maybe I'm missing something but this just doesn't make any sense to me.

                        #10.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 7:07 AM EDT
                        Reply

                        It's a game and only a game. The problem is we live in a world of constant complaining.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#11 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:41 PM EDT

                        "Stober had planned to release the game last Sunday on the anniversary of German reunification. But officials with Stober's university said the game will now be released in December as a free download."

                        this seems to imply that he was going to charge for this game, which is clearly a modification of the source engine (to anyone who has played it). In the US at least, its illegal to charge for a modification of a game.

                          Reply#12 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:46 PM EDT

                          By all means, let's all whitewash our history to delete or conceal any unpleasant details about our past.

                          <sarcasm>After all, we don't want to learn from our history, as painful as that might be, right?</sarcasm>

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#13 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:46 PM EDT

                          The Germans don't like this? Gee, wonder why. Personally I don't give a hoot in hell what the Germans like or dislike.

                            Reply#14 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:56 PM EDT
                            Reply

                            If the "guards" don't have to shoot escapees but instead can arrest them or flee with them, the game is already a mockery, since most guards, there can be little doubt, simply gunned down those making their escape. So then this game is just the latest continuing  attempt by Germans to deny the savagery of their own past. That is the real travesty, not a game that portrays the truth.

                              Reply#15 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 8:57 PM EDT

                              The Germans were the victims of most of this. Guards USUALLY made arrests and there are many documented cases of East German (NOT GERMANY) guards jumping the wall!

                              I guess some people make there own truth when the facts are not there!

                                #15.1 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 9:49 PM EDT

                                Yeah, beyondreallity,

                                Those Germans were real humanitarians and pacifists. We all know that....

                                  #15.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:35 AM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  Get a life.... Its A GAME...........................DAAAAAAAA

                                    Reply#16 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 9:48 PM EDT

                                    Wow - you're angered by things that happened in your country's history? If you don't like it - stop doing things that will be portrayed in video games of the future....

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#17 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 10:12 PM EDT

                                    The game's numeric title refers to the length of the wall that once divided East Germany from West Germany during the Cold War years.

                                    Winda Benedetti needs to take a history class before she's allowed to write any more articles. The game title refers to the length of the "Inner German border" that once divided East & West Germany. Only about 29 km of the entire length were actual walls. Most of the barrier was made up of fencing. Perhaps Ms. Benedetti is confusing the Inner German border with the Berlin Wall that seperated East & West Berlin. For anyone interested, here's a link to a very extensive history of the Inner German border: http://wapedia.mobi/en/Inner_German_border

                                      Reply#18 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:11 AM EDT

                                      way to COMPLETELY miss the point, Jeen.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#19 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 1:24 AM EDT

                                      Here's an idea.  If you think the game is going to bother you for whatever reason, don't download or play it.

                                      • 2 votes
                                      Reply#20 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 2:05 AM EDT

                                      Jens Stober, a 23-year-old student at the University of Design, Media and Arts in Karlsruhe, Germany, has created a game called "1378 (km)."

                                      Dude is 23, I would guess he has an older silent partner with skill's. The game is nothing but pure marketing genius! I mean to get the whole country in an up roar in the 1st week it's out. Controversy equals big sales. Dude is going to make a pile a euros

                                      Someone should make a game here, Atheist save children by cleansing American of Bible Thumpers by Public beatings and burning Bibles also killing Christian radicals that are turned in by their kids for making them believe in son of the Invisible Man.

                                      lol......Call it "Wipe out"

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#21 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 2:27 AM EDT

                                      You sound like the Taliban, what have Christians ever done to you?

                                      It's not Christians going around threatening to blow things up, moron.

                                        #21.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 8:46 AM EDT

                                        I would def pre-order a copy of "Wipe Out" aliasjb - lol. But you'd have to be careful of the priests in the game - they have Jesus spells that make little kids pants fall down so they can't run away!

                                          #21.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:48 AM EDT
                                          Reply

                                          waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

                                            Reply#22 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 3:21 AM EDT

                                            Imagine what would happen if they made a game about the Vietnam War (with the option to play as both sides) here in the good old USA......

                                              Reply#23 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 4:59 AM EDT

                                              There was a Vietnam game where you could play an American soldier or NVA (North Vietnamese Army) it was called Battlefield Vietnam based on the hugely popular Battlefield 1942 game. It is nothing to get offended about.

                                                #23.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:16 AM EDT
                                                Reply

                                                So f***ing what? Give it a rest. Who cares, let people frag how they want. This is a waste of time.

                                                  Reply#24 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 7:21 AM EDT

                                                  Yet you had no problem wasting your time to comment about people who are, to you, wasting their time.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #24.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 7:26 AM EDT
                                                  Reply

                                                  The wall divided Germany and it divided families. Real people, of all ages, died trying to get over, under or around it. This isn't ancient history in Germany. It's very much "real" for many, as is the related sorrow that survivors feel for their lost loved ones. To create a GAME based on the suffering of people is obscene, regardless of its "educational" content. What's next? A game that lets players pretend that they're the Columbine killers, allowing them to have a "change of heart" as they walk through school corridors and not kill anyone? Or a game based on 9/11?

                                                    Reply#25 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 7:23 AM EDT
                                                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                    Leave a Comment:
                                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                    Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                    Stop TrackingStop Tracking